• Economics of a Recession

    We are in a great period of Expansion. To understand Expansions and Recessions we first must understand the Business Cycle.

    As Adam Smith said in the Wealth of Nations, there is a term known as the “Invisible Hand.” This invisible hand is key to understanding the wealth of nations. It will be described in detail in future blogs.

    This theory held till 1929 or Black Friday. After Black Friday, the stock market would not clear on its own. Therefor Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) turned to John M. Keynes. He devised that Government spending should take the place of private investment spending, when Gross Domestic Product= Private Consumer Spending +Private Investment Spending + Government Spending + (Exports – Imports). Next, FDR initiated the new deal. This deal, had the government, hire people instead of corporations. This along with World War II pulled the United States out of the Great Depression.

    In 1980 the US saw something new called Stagflation or inflation along with a sluggish economy. President Ronald Reagan took action along with sharp tax cuts across the board. Reagan found that if you cut taxes, corporations would pay the taxes instead of looking for loop holes in the tax policy; in an attempt to not pay taxes. This lead to the next great expansionary period in American history.

  • The Economics of Market Share

    Market share is important to maintaining profitability. First lets define market share. Market share is the percentage of sales that a company occupies in a particular sector. For example, Ford Motor Company controls 11.56% of the US market for trucks and light vehicles.

    There are two ways to increase Market Share, one is to obtain new customers, and the second is to take customers from your competitors.

    In some markets you cannot gain new customers due to fierce competitions and razor thin margins. In a market such as this a company needs to take customers from the competitors.

    Ways to take completion from competitors:

    -coupons

    -World Class Customer Service

    -price matching

    -new products

    -differentiation

    -branding

    -focus groups

    -surveys

  • The Case for Free Trade

    Tariffs, Comparative Advantage, and Opportunity Cost

    In an ideal world, Countries would produce goods that they have a Comparative Advantage in. Comparative Advantage means that companies make goods that they can produce most efficiently or with the least opportunity cost to produce. Opportunity cost means that an individual has the choice between two different things: for example going to college or working full time. If they work full time, they can make 20k per year, if they go to college for 4 years; they can then make 40k per year with their college degree. So therefore going to college has an opportunity cost of 80k over 4 years, or the money that was lost by not working and going to school.

    Therefore if a country has an comparative advantage, then they should produce what they can make most efficiently and export that good. This means that they should only produce comparative advantage goods and import everything else. For example, Honduras has a comparative advantage in producing bananas. This means that Honduras devotes most of their resources to producing bananas for export, and therefore imports everything else.

    In our example with Honduras, lets say the United States places a tariff on Bananas. Bananas will now cost more in the United States, price will increase on bananas in the United States, and the quantity demanded in The United States will fall. If people in the United States demand less Bananas due to the tariff, Honduras will now sell less bananas to the United States, and depending on how large a buyer the United States is of bananas, this could potentially significantly lower Honduras exports of bananas. Therefore if Honduras sells less bananas, they are able to import fewer other goods needed in their economy.

    In this simple example, it is clear that Honduras and the United States are significantly hurt by a tariff imposed by the United States on Bananas.